Unless you can provide documentation of this claim in the form of a statement by the author that the book was "intended solely as humor", that is a third-party opinion and, as such, has no place in this article.
It's not a third party opinion. The book was published by a mainstream publisher in the Humor category and the introduction to the book clearly states the book is humor and the actions in it would be counterproductive to carry out. If I can track down a copy I will post a verbatim quote from the book in the article. Kaibabsquirrel 01:15, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
If you want to quote the introduction, that would be fine. Otherwise, saying it is humor is an opinion. --JonGwynne 19:00, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
