Jump to content

Talk:East Liverpool, Ohio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

One year, there were more murders per capita in East Liverpool than any other city in the US. I'm not sure what year that was. I was a preteen then so it was about 20 years ago. I guess maybe mid to late 80's.

[edit]

I don't see the relevance of this link to this article. It should be removed.

I also do not see the relevance or what this article's purpose is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.89.55.165 (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on East Liverpool, Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on East Liverpool, Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on East Liverpool, Ohio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History - seeking consensus on this information for re-addition

[edit]

The passage "Potters from Staffordshire, England began pouring into East Liverpool, Ohio. They were attracted mostly by higher wages, but also by the prospect of land ownership and the promise of a "meatier diet". Letters from English immigrants in Ohio back to family members in England frequently make reference to how often they ate meat. By 1879, there were twenty-four potteries in East Liverpool, which employed over two hundred people (including men, women and children), nearly all of whom were English immigrants and their families. As late as 1900 East Liverpool remained "essentially a transplanted potting town of Englishmen". The vast majority of the fiteen thousand inhabitants were English immigrants and their children." was deleted, all of the information is found in the source: British Buckeyes: The English, Scots, and Welsh in Ohio, 1700-1900, specifically pages 135-137. I believe this was erroneously deleted, and the source, and information are all entirely within wikipedia requirements for addition, and should therefore be re-added.174.70.84.42 (talk) 14:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source in question is a peer-reviewed verifiable, academically published source (the sources are entirely fit Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources). The information is not disputed by any other source, the claim is entirely in line with what appears on town and county history pages. The justification for deletion remains unclear.174.70.84.42 (talk) 22:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These additions fall firmly within wikipedia guidelines pertaining to http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Responsibility_for_providing_citations and http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Due_and_undue_weight and should not be deleted again within establishing consensus for such deletion here on the talk page. Thus far, no such consensus has been reached. and therefore the additions should not be deleted.174.70.84.42 (talk) 11:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely - should be in. Why on earth not? Johnbod (talk) 15:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]