Talk:Dwight Nelson

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Seventh-day Adventist Church Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Dwight Nelson be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bowling Green Daily News 'Church News'

I would suggest caution about using this source for the claim of "over 100 countries with translations in 40 languages" -- this piece is an announcements section, most probably submitted by the locally affiliated church -- not a news article. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 19:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dwight-Nelson.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Dwight-Nelson.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion Reversion

Under Background and Family, a user recently updated this article with the following paragraph:

“They together have a grandchild named Ruthy. Ruthy attends Log County Christian Prep school where she is making no friends. Nelson also has a very big distaste for the bells in his church. He also says that watching church online is a sin which will result in your being hell bound.”

The conclusions are dubious, they add little of worth to the article and they appear to bully Ruthy.

I suggest the article be reverted to its prior state. Pomology2 (talk) 23:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]