Talk:Duchy of Courland and Semigallia (1918)

Latvia Low‑importance

	Latvia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Baltic states / European / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Baltic states military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Flag

did the Duchy of Courland and Semigallia (1918) really use the national flag of Latvia? Why would the Baltic Germans do that? Please provide the source or else the flag should be removed from the article. thanks--Termer (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about the flag? Could somebody provide the source? Or should the flag be removed from the page? --Mmh (talk) 19:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wilchelm v. Hertling?

As far as I know, the Chancellor of Germany at the time was Georg von Hertling, not "Wilchelm" (sic). A guy named "Wilhelm" (II) was the Kaiser, though ... Perhaps both the Kaiser and his Chancellor were meant to sign this document? — Zalktis (talk) 17:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Factual accuracy disputed

since citations have not been provided, I have to proceed with this and tag the article accordingly. The fact is, during the entire German occupation Courland remained under direct military administration, therefore calling it a state is quite a stretch.

Also the fact is: On October 1918 the Chancellor of Germany Prince Maximilian of Baden proposed to have the military administration in the Baltic replaced by civilian authority. The new policy was stated with a telegram from the German Foreign Office to the military administration of the Baltic: The government of the Reich is unanimous in respect of the fundamental change in our policy towards the Baltic countries, namely that in the first instance policy is to be made with the Baltic peoples. In Latvia the German occupying powers formally handed over the authority to the Latvian national government headed by Kārlis Ulmanis on December 7 1918. @ The Baltic States and Weimar Ostpolitik By John Hiden

So what is this state the article talks about all about?--Termer (talk) 08:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a tad bit confused

It says it was not realized, so how exactly did it last from 1918 to June 1919 if it never came to exist in the first place 172.117.162.40 (talk) 07:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]