Talk:Drakengard (video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: CR4ZE (talk · contribs) 05:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   The prose is excellent. I picked up a few mistakes here and there, but I decided to just copy-edit the article myself.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   Please remove Batoto.net and find replacements for Amazon.

   Done, but I couldn't find any other sources for Drag-On Dragoon Judgement, so its existence can't be proven on this site as far as I can tell. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Both File:Drakengard Coverart.png and File:Drakengard1ground gameplay.jpg look great and have appropriate rationales.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Just fix up those couple of sources and this article's good to go. CR4ZE (t) 05:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

✓ Pass. The article is written and sourced at a very high standard. Excellent work. CR4ZE (t) 08:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)