Talk:Djadochta Formation

Paleobiota help

Code

This section contains pre-made code that can be copy and pasted into articles containing paleobiota tables. To save space, not all of the code is visible, additional code can be found by simply viewing this section's edit page.

Premade rowspans:

| rowspan="2" |

| rowspan="3" |

| rowspan="4" |

| rowspan="5" |

| rowspan="6" |

| rowspan="7" |

Replacement headings for "Presence" column

! Location
! Stratigraphic position
! Material

Replacement headings for "Taxa" column

Cell background colors

The background colors of the cells are a means to communicate the relevant organism's taxonomic status.

Color key Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon		Notes Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.

Red for reclassified and preoccupied

|style="background:#fbdddb;" |

Purple for taxa falsely reported as present:

|style="background:#f3e9f3;" |

Dark grey for discredited taxa:

|style="background:#E6E6E6;" |

Peach for Ichnotaxa:

|style="background:#FEF6E4;" |

Light blue for Ootaxa:

|style="background:#E3F5FF;" |

Light green for Morphotaxa:

|style="background:#D1FFCF;" |

Oviraptor in Weishampel

Apparently Weishampel 2004 lists O. philoceratops remains from Inner Mongolia. Does it say which specimens these are? I was under the impression Oviraptor is considered to be known only from the holotype, referred specimens having been re-assigned and any other not re-assigned yet, are still assigned in error. If we can pin down a specimen number for the Chinese specimen we can figure out if that's the case for this one too. It's odd that Theropod Database doesn't list any Djadochtan oviraptorids from China at all. I wonder if the "Djadochta" in China has been re-assigned to a new formation since Weishampel? Dinoguy2 (talk) 21:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Actually, after a quick search it looks like Weishampel is almost certainly lumping the Bayan Mandahu Formation of Inner Mongolia in with the Djadochta. We should at least try to be consistent! Dinoguy2 (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

A quick glance at the index shows Weishampel and the gang didn't create a distinct distribution entry for Bayan Mandahu Formation so you may be right. Also, when the BMF was mentioned in the various sections on individual dinosaur clades it was always described as containing genera listed as Djadochtan in the Distribution chapter, so it seems likely they did indeed treat the formations as synonymous. A quick glance at the references though shows that the strata in question were considered Djadochtan as far back as 1993. A 1989 paper by Dong et al. is the oldest cited reference in Weishampel et al, but it's title is unhelpful. A brief google search shows that the authors considered the BMF and Djadochta to be probably synonymous even back then. I'm not sure I feel comfortable merging the pages until we can get a source saying something more explicit instead of WP:ORing here, though. Especially if there are multiple "BMF" outcrops out there, they might not all be synonymous with the Djadochta. Abyssal (talk) 23:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Djadochta Formation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130929074932/http://archosaur.us/theropoddatabase/Tyrannosauroidea.html to http://archosaur.us/theropoddatabase/Tyrannosauroidea.html#Tyrannosaurusrex

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Clouds

I apologize if this seems obtuse, but the lead notes a lack of clouds in the Gobi desert, yet the top photograph shows a good supply of them. Maybe you can make a less definitive statement, such as 'tends to restrict clouds', if that is the case. Verne Equinox (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Velociraptor Restoration.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)