Talk:District tartans of Australia

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heraldry and vexillology

District tartans of Australia is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology

Textile arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile artsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile artsTemplate:WikiProject Textile artsTextile arts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Australia: Canberra / New South Wales / South Australia / Queensland / Tasmania / Victoria / Western Australia Low‑importance

District tartans of Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).

Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of Queensland, or the State Library of Western Australia, or the State Library of South Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.

The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help

wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from District tartans of Australia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Scottish Register of Tartans has registered district tartans for Australia as a whole, and also a state district tartan for each of Australia's six states?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/District tartans of Australia.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 14:04, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Scottish Register of Tartans has registered district tartans for Australia as a whole, and also a State district tartan for each of Australia's six States? Source: Australian National, The Australia, Australia Dress, Australia 2000; NSW, Qld, SA Official, Tas, Vic State (Australia), WA (Scottish Associations)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Vecihi Hürkuş

Moved to mainspace by Bahnfrend (talk). Self-nominated at 04:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

New, long and colourful article. Looks neutral and sources look good. The last paragraph in the first section refers to sourced info below, which I think is acceptable, but it wouldn't hurt to add inline citations there too. No copyright issues found - the quoted descriptions should be OK and the images are motivated and have fair-use rationales. The hook is interesting and within the character limit. QPQ is done. Should be good to go, well done! Ffranc (talk) 11:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

In this context, what is a district? It's not defined here or in the section to which district tartan redirects. I don't suppose there's a "clan district" (again, used but undefined in the target article) outside Scotland, since the Scottish clan system didn't exist on the other side of the world. 175.39.61.121 (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Do we know for a fact that copyright pertains to all of these? I notice that the images used on this page are, in every single case, flagged as non-free, yet they generally lack any information on a purported copyright holder (designers are listed, but there's no indication of a copyright claim). SRT's own listing of these tartans shows almost all of them (I did see two exceptions) not listed as copyright or otherwise restricted. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]