Jump to content

Talk:Disabled veteran street vendors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title

[edit]

The title of this article should probably be changed to reflect that it is restricted entirely to New York, and does not discuss the issue as it may appear in the rest of the world. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see some proof that disabled veteran street vendors have any special status anywhere else in the world before employing needless disambiguation. Savidan 23:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Today I met a panhandler who mis-represented the situation. But he did inspire me to research whether New Jersey and other states have laws similar to what I documented here for New York. A simple Google search leads one to information from Connecticut and Indiana. I would like to see this article made more generic. -- tbc (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide links to something reliable. Preferably, the statute or court decision itself. At the least, a published source. Savidan 21:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Disabled veteran street vendors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]