Jump to content

Talk:Devocalization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"in most instances"

[edit]

This article says that "in most instances" proper training will fix compulsive barking. But there are no sources or citations provided. Overall the article is POV and severely lacking in citations/references. This should be rememdied.

In the meantime, I settled for correcting the spelling of "procedure". Throughout the article, the author spelled it "proceedure" so I fixed it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.245.138.168 (talkcontribs) 15:09, December 21, 2006 (UTC)

procedure

[edit]

I came here and fixed some spelling; however after fixing it I checked the article's history and I can see that someone keeps reverting the spelling to be incorrect. Why? 'PROCEEDURE' is not correct, fool. Stop reverting it. If you want people to take this article seriously please stop changing the spelling, you ass. Someone keeps reverting "procedure" to "proceedure" what a moron STOP IT. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.245.138.168 (talkcontribs) 15:17, December 21, 2006 (UTC)

A troll has clearly been at the "reasons favoring" section

[edit]

I'm not an editor, but I doubt these phrases meet Wikipedia's standards:

"The owners can live in peace, they may even devocalize human children who they don't want to hear. The owners can relax and not have to train their dog. They can also remove teeth to avoid any further nuisance."

Just wanting to give a heads up. 2601:8C3:8680:37C0:2EF3:2394:FF1:8B2C (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Why is there links to debarking and disembarkation?? this is clearly troll 2600:4040:2CA4:8700:8C88:9E47:9EA0:39AD (talk) 03:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the links, thanks for pointing it out. They were added in this edit by a now-banned user. Iiii I I I (talk) 03:23, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]