This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Schweikert article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Schweikert voted against Amendment #742 on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 which would prohibit the use of federal funds in carrying out the recommendations made by The Naming Commission. The Naming Commission was tasked in the renaming and removal of memorials and military bases named after or for Confederate veterans. Voting against Amendment #742 allowed for federal funds to carry out recommendations made by The Naming Commission "to remove Confederate associate objects and memorabilia". This this vote paved the way for the removal of the Confederate Memorial (Arlington National Cemetery) which is also known as the Confederate Reconciliation Memorial within Arlington National Cemetery.
Considering votes speak political positions, should it be noted that Rep Schweikert is against Confederate Veterans or Confederate Symbols since he helped allow the Arlington Confederate Memorial to be removed? If he was pro Confederate veteran or symbols, he would have voted for the amendment to stop funding.
My edit to include that on a political stance has been deleted by @Marquardtika. A stance on Confederate Monuments is now seen as a political stance by the general public and would sway voters if someone was pro Confederate memorial or anti-Confederate memorial. Azhistorylov (talk) 02:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The issue here is that the sources you have added are not reliable. You have added a source from the Discovery Institute. Not reliable. You have added a source that is a Tweet from an advocacy group. Not reliable. You have added the roll call vote from the House, which is fine, but it's not enough sourcing to justify including this. The House takes hundreds (thousands?) of roll call votes, so in order to show that any particular vote is noteworthy for inclusion here, we need corroborating independent sources. The Discovery Institute and Twitter are not sufficient. Can you find any better sourcing? Marquardtika (talk) 14:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
