Jump to content

Talk:Dale Kildee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Successors

[edit]

Can not be a successor to other legislators that concurrently held office at times and that Mr. Kildee preceeding in hold office. Spshu (talk) 16:29, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They held different offices, so he certainly could succeed someone who held that office previously and simultaneously succeeded to a different office at the same time. But, in any case, your edits to the succession boxes are not unreasonable. They do help to clarify a source of confusion. olderwiser 17:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've edited the succession boxes to reflect the "district successors," in order for consistency based on other articles. Kildee is listed as the predecessor and successor for several other representatives' articles. I also added footnotes to address Spshu's concerns, making it clear that these were successors based on the district number, rather than direct geographic succession. That's how Bart Stupak's article is addressed. With respect to the 5th district, Barcia was directly succeeded by Kildee by virtue of georgraphy and district number. Barcia's home was added to Kildee's district, which was then renumbered from 9th to 5th. If Barcia had opted to run for reelection rather than seek state-level office, he would have had to run against Kildee in a primary to keep his seat.Dcmacnut (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested move

[edit]

Perhaps this page should be moved to Dale Kildee, as that is the name he is more commonly known by, and his official congressional website lists that name. -Conrad (talk) 04:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Kelly hi! 03:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse allegations

[edit]

I added a brief mention that Kildee will be holding a press conference to address abuse allegations on November 21, as reported by the The Washington Times. It's best to get a neutral statement into the article, otherwise curious people will visit, and, seeing nothing, add statements that likely violate WP:BLP. Kelly hi! 03:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad - discussion should likely be centralized at WP:BLPN#Dale Kildee. Apologies. Kelly hi! 03:51, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dale Kildee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]