Talk:Cyclones Katrina and Victor–Cindy

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Tropical disturbance#South-Western Indian Ocean|tropical disturbance]] The anchor (#South-Western Indian Ocean) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Todo

Finish/source MH and don't use "staff Writer" in the refs. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 23:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Move?

I would like to propose that we move this article to Cyclone Katrina as after examining the meteorology behind the systems i have realsied that it was only a remnant of K that became VC. As a result i would also like to move the focus on to just Katrina, but keep a few bits relevant to Victor Cindy in the article.Jason Rees (talk) 21:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention, Cindy was a disturbance when it was named. The latter portion was just a generic Indian Ocean storm. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Rees: Since this article will focus on Katrina, I think that Victor-Cindy sould be only mentioned on about its formation from Katrina's remnants. Since Victor-Cindy had little relevance on Katrina, most of its info should be realocated to its sections on both Aus and SWIO season's articles. ABC paulista (talk) 01:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While I haven't quite gotten that far with the rework yet, I feel that a paragraph on Victor-Cindy would suffice for this article.Jason Rees (talk) 01:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cyclone Katrina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move question (not a formal request yet)

Given the precedent in Amanda/Cristobal & Gulab/Shaheen, I would like to ask: is it okay to change this article's title to "Cyclones Katrina and Victor-Cindy"? What happened here was very similar to the articles mentioned. Vida0007 (talk) 03:50, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The question is: Would adding Victor-Cindy into this article actually benefit it somehow? ABC paulista (talk) 21:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ABC paulista: Our hands are tied by Wikipedia's policies in this case, as more details on Victor-Cindy will need to be added to the article before it goes for GA/FA.Jason Rees (talk) 11:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Rees, if that's so, then I'd support such move. ABC paulista (talk) 20:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly Support – Reformatting this article into a combined title, with the title Cyclones Katrina and Victor–Cindy. The systems are basically related (likely a redevelopment of the same storm), even if it isn't officially recognized as the same tropical cyclone. Both phases of the storm also affected Australia, which means that there are overlapping impacts as well. The story of the storm is basically incomplete without including the details on both Katrina and Victor–Cindy, and as such, the article can't make it to GA/FA as it is right now. I believe that renaming and reformatting this article is what needs to happen. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 17:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Im not so sure that Victor-Cindy had any impacts and if there will be enough MH to justify putting Victor-Cindy in the title. I also doubt that the article needs reformating like @LightandDark2000: has suggested since the MH can simply be combined.Jason Rees (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If Victor-Cindy is fully integrated here, it should be mentioned on the title, otherwise the title could misled the reader into believing that, either all its contents are only about Katrina, or that Victor-Cindy was considered the same system as Katrina. Both are untrue, and we should avoid that. ABC paulista (talk) 21:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]