Jump to content

Talk:Cyclone Anne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCyclone Anne has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 27, 2015Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Anne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 03:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All in all pretty good. Lemme know if there are any questions! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've bolded what's left to be done. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Class reviews

[edit]

So im thinking of taking this too FAC and would appreciate some comments on the article before it goes up. Thus i am launching an A Class Review.Jason Rees (talk) 14:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Still not a biggest fan of the opening sentence with regards to sourcing.
  • "Over the next few days the system gradually developed further as it was steered towards the southwest by an area of high pressure, before it was named Anne on January 8, after it had become a tropical cyclone" - timing is unclear/confusing. In general, don't use the "before" construction too much. It's just confusing.
  • Watch for duplicate linking in Preps/impact
  • You might have to check, but I don't think "and/or" should be in an article that's going up for FAC
  • When you describe the impact in the lead, I think you should be clearer when you're saying what country was affected. "Temotu Province, Vanuatu and New Caledonia" makes it seem like three different areas. Start with one area and go to the next, ideally chronologically.
  • "On January 5, 1988, the Fiji Meteorological Service's Nadi Tropical Cyclone Warning Center (TCWC Nadi)" - if I didn't know anything about tropical cyclones, I would stop reading this sentence at this point. It's way too much at the beginning of the MH. Please just use the FMS instead of the full name, and perhaps put in a note what the full office is.
  • "Anne had peaked, with estimated 10-minute peak " - redundancy

That's just the beginning part of the article. It couldn't hurt to get a copyeditor for the entire article if you're going for FAC still. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]