Talk:Cursive (band)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Post-hardcore Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Post-hardcore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of post-hardcore and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Post-hardcoreWikipedia:WikiProject Post-hardcoreTemplate:WikiProject Post-hardcorePost-hardcore
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Genre

Cursive's latest release has been labeled "post-emo" by Pitchfork. However, I haven't been able to find much correlating material. Worthy of being in the article? --Tanner 13:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think at this point that seems like a ridiculous genre, unless one can describe what "post-emo" is (and I doubt Pitchfork is qualified). Their newest release is pretty much straight up rock or punk, with some minor mixing of other genres, like soul, swing, jazz, or emo. — littletinyfish 2006-08-26 16:27

Agree. People are calling anything that isn't bound by conventional genres "post-whatever it sound similar to".

There is nothing "emo" about this band. They're simply alternative.

Alternative is not a genre. It's a terrible way of describing music because everything is an alternative to something. Even indie rock is fairly lackadaisical in how it paints the music. In all reality, "post-hardcore" does fit very well, and much better than emo. From their conception all the way up to Happy Hollow they have embodied the energy and experimentation of bands like Fugazi and At the Drive-In among others, and it should accompany the band's description alongside the generic indie-rock tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.171.91 (talk) 06:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno. If you read up on emo you might find Cursive fits all too well. That being said, I think the definition of "emo" has spread so that it could encapsulate just about any band. My favorite part in the article:

“

The classification of bands as "emo" is often controversial. Fans of several of the listed bands have recoiled at the use of the "emo" tag, and have gone to great lengths to explain why they don't qualify as "emo". In many cases, the term has simply been attached to them because of musical similarites, a common fashion sense, or because of the band's popularity within the "emo" scene, not because the band adheres to emo as a music genre.

”

Little tinyfish 18:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just leave it at indie rock because that genre can be anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.64.155 (talk) 20:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

= No wawe harcore= —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.102.36.124 (talk) 18:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Better Update

Cursive seems like a pretty big band to have such a lousy Wikipedia entry. I'm attempting to make it a little bit more respectable, but some more help would be nice. Specifically I don't have much information on their pre-Domestica years.

Well done on trying to improve this article, but I'm not sure that your changes are actually an improvement. Sentences like "It was written like a one-act play documenting the lies, hate and deceit associated with a divorce" and "With this album the Kasher turned away from attacking himself and began attacking bad politics, empty suburban lives, and religious hypocrisy" betray a POV, and are more suited to a review than an enclyclopedia entry. And you need to cite references for all the assertions, from Rolling Stone reviews to Saddle Creek anouncements etc.Wastekiller 10:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. I'm still a little new at this and still trying to understand the finer points.— littletinyfish 2006-08-26 16:27

I think someone is leaving out their Eight Teeth to Eat You EP, also.

Garbage

Aside from the discography this article is terrible. Nothing is cited and it reads like a fan's interpretation. Accuracy is pretty poor as well. Shortly after going on hiatus saddle creek announced the new record? Only if you count two years as shortly.

Emo?

Will someone please delete Emo from the genre section and yes I did check the source its for one CD and not even there best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.186.64.155 (talk) 10:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

members

On three photos of facebook page we see a five-piece band [1] [http://www.facebook.com/photo.php? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chemikalero9 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cursive (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://welcometoflavorcountry.com/2013/02/11/solving-a-million-and-one-philosophical-dilemmas-with-tim-kasher-of-cursive/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cursive (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071108091009/http://saddle-creek.com/bands/reviews_cursive.php?id_number=610 to http://saddle-creek.com/bands/reviews_cursive.php?id_number=610

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]