Talk:Curators of Sweden

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Disgraceful

@sweden is disgraceful, summoning up scary images of Nazi PR efforts in the 1930s. There are most definitely grounds for controversy, but the guardians of this piece aren't going to allow that, are they? Do we believe in and support free speech or not?

Rotation Curation Account list

The list of rotation curation accounts replicates the list on the Rotation Curation page. Here it seems out of place and creates a maintenance problem. I propose we delete it from this article. Anyone have any views on this? I also noticed that this page was not linked to the Rotation Curation page so I fixed that. Andrew Hennigan (talk) 21:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would make sense, there's no need to duplicate content on two articles.

OK. Replaced the list with a link to the list section of the rotation curation page so we have just one list to maintain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewhennigan (talk • contribs) 07:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On an unrelated note, I found this article after reading about a controversy involving this campaign, where the Sweden Twitter account was used to post antisemitic messages[1]. I don't think that source meets reliable source guidelines, so I'm not adding it to the article for now, but I'll just leave that here in case the story gets any broader coverage. Robofish (talk) 00:46, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many sources like The Slate[2] provide the whole sequence of tweets and it seems clear when you read them all that the intent was not antisemitic; I don't see any reliable source making that interpretation. But it would make sense to have some reference to the attention and controversy in general, since these are a key part of this story. The New York Times article[3] must be reliable enough for this. Andrew Hennigan (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cannes silver Lion

This initiative just won a silver lion at the International Festival of Creativity in Cannes. See http://www.canneslions.com/work/2012/pr/entry.cfm?entryid=14315&award=3 I will add this if nobody objects. Andrew Hennigan (talk) 11:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just added this award and a link to the relevant page. Doing this I noticed that the other awards lack sources. Does anyone have the necessary citations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewhennigan (talk • contribs) 07:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curators of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120523222207/http://www.visitsweden.com/sweden/PressRoom/Local-press-rooms/UK/News/Press-releases-2012/Swedens-citizen-driven-nation-branding-is-a-global-success/ to http://www.visitsweden.com/sweden/PressRoom/Local-press-rooms/UK/News/Press-releases-2012/Swedens-citizen-driven-nation-branding-is-a-global-success/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]