Talk:Creole cream cheese

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Cheeses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

United States: New Orleans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as Low-importance).

Needs rewrite from independent sources

This article is poor to the point it qualifies for deletion. It needs a complete rewrite from reliable and independent sources. --Ronz (talk) 22:03, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article can certainly be improved (eg, info on the history of Creole cream cheese is currently lacking). The subject is a notable bit of local culinary culture - you can list it for proposed deletin if you wish, but I would oppose. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So how do we treat local culinary culture properly for an encyclopedia article? Not with press releases and local interest stories. --Ronz (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You use the best sources you can, but you don't remove content that isn't realistically disputed. I appreciate that the editing now appears to be moving forward in a productive manner. I agree with Candleabracadabra that when Blue Bell (a notable company with considerable mystique in that part of the country) revives its commercial distribution of this "endangered" flavor, it's worth including in the article; the source is used only to verify an objective fact and is reliable for that purpose. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:51, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So their press releases are noteworthy because they are?! No. It's notable when independent sources say so.

We have a ton of trivial detail based upon highly questionable sources. The information simply doesn't belong without better sources.

It's clear that content is being added without regard to related content, what would be considered encyclopedic, or the quality of sources. As a result, we have mostly a prose list of companies and events that highlight the product.

"you don't remove content that isn't realistically disputed" You mean like all the information that I restored that was removed as "disruptive" [1]? If so, I agree. Otherwise, the statement is meaningless as far as I can tell. I removed information that was in my opinion trivia and undue. There's lots more to be removed if independent sources are not forthcoming. --Ronz (talk) 00:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded all the references for easy examination and proper identification. Since we now have at least a few good sources is it time to rewrite from them, removing all the trivia? --Ronz (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've started with a 2012 summer restaurant guide being used as a reference. --Ronz (talk) 03:19, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Creole cream cheese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120501122256/http://appetiteforlife.msn.com:80/articles/detail/milklady-cheesecake?wt.mc_id=msnhp to http://appetiteforlife.msn.com/articles/detail/milklady-cheesecake?wt.mc_id=msnhp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]