Talk:Crater Glacier

Crater Glacier was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 3, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
July 10, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
February 15, 2023	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Crater Glacier is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glaciers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This glacier is officially named "Crater Glacier", not "Tulutson Glacier"

The official name for this feature is "Crater Glacier", as decided by an 8-4 vote of the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, Domestic Names Committee, in June 2006. This supersedes the earlier decision by the Washington State Board on Geographic Names in 2005 to name it "Tulutson Glacier", and is now the official name required for use in all US government documents and publications.

References:

The name "Crater Glacier" has been in wide use with the public (at least those who were aware of its existence) for the two decades since the glacier formed, and has appeared in scientific publications too. The name "Tulutson Glacier" was completely unheard of until the 2005 WSBGN decision, and has not been used in any official or scientific publications.

We should change any references to this glacier throughout WP from "Tulutson Glacier" to "Crater Glacier". I just wanted to put a note here in case of any future controversy about this issue. I've also adding a section on the naming issue to the article, with lots of references. Thanks. Seattle Skier 04:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too many images

I think some of the images are redundant and they should be removed. Hydrogen Iodide 07:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Crater Glacier/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Well done.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the History section, "2004" should not be linked, per here.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
The date on Reference 23 needs to be fixed.

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, unlinked unimportant years, such as 1980, 1981, 2004. Also checked the date on ref 23 and it said 12/2004, and unlinked 2004-12 and Austin Post, which were both redlinks. Cheers. _{Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab} 19:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to Trance addict for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) Also, what topic does the article go in? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crater Glacier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113082031/http://www.katu.com/news/local/18948279.html to http://www.katu.com/news/local/18948279.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Need new source on rate of glacial expansion

The source number 17 is not an appropriate source, it links to a conspiracy website rather than an actual USFS publication. I am new to editing and not sure what the best replacement citation would be. Hope someone can help!

Kindred12 (talk) 04:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Crater Glacier

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article hasn't been updated much since it's listing in 2008. Contains sentences like:

after the current eruptive cycle began and the new dome began to split the glacier (2004 sources)
The latest aerial imagery taken in 2012 (2009(!) source)
Quite a few unsourced sentences too. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.