Talk:Cosmogenesis
Appearance
![]() | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Cosmogony Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Cosmogony |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Science
[edit]Does this actually have ANYTHING to do with science or physics? Looks like a pile of poppycock to me. Fatalis 18:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed. The word cosmogenesis is in common use as a scientific term, but instead we have a couple of random examples of people using it a century ago as some metaphysical opinion. Bobathon (talk) 15:09, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class physics articles
- NA-importance physics articles
- Redirect-Class physics articles of NA-importance
- Redirect-Class science articles
- NA-importance science articles
- Redirect-Class Philosophy articles
- NA-importance Philosophy articles
- Redirect-Class metaphysics articles
- NA-importance metaphysics articles
- Metaphysics task force articles
- Redirect-Class philosophy of science articles
- NA-importance philosophy of science articles
- Philosophy of science task force articles