Talk:Contagious Diseases Acts

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Contagious Diseases Acts article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Contagious Diseases Act

I was supposed to move this article to a new page called Contagious Diseases Acts, but when I attempted to do so, some guy with an anonymous IP wrote the article (on the same day!), which I might add, needs to be cleaned up and wikified. RashBold 21:18, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Contagious Disease act in Britian was a particular act with a particular effect. It should remain under this page, although the information contained therein should be included in a general overview of contagious diseases acts. The German example would probably not be all that helpful in this particular British example.

This article ignores information from Walkewitiz's book on prostitution in victorian england. (which may indeed be titled that) This argues that the act formalized what had been an informal prostitution, trapping young women in that lifestyle weras before prostitution had simply been a way to supplement thier income. Also, my research on the CD acts indicates that they were abolished by a strange partership of White Cross purity activists who wanted to eliminate vice and early feminists who wanted to improve the living conditions of prostitutes. Both wanted to recind the CD acts but once that goal was accomplished thier differences were not bridgeable. anyway,when i get a change i will put this in. user: notenderwiggin

The problem is that there were 3 CD Acts in Victorian Britain, all of which were designed to target very specific groups of prostitutes. And as the previous comment indicated, the CD Acts had significant implications, joining evangelical preachers and people like Josephine Butler in the same cause. The English Acts need their own page.

The English Acts are separate from the European ones, having occurred later in the 19th century (1864, 1866, and 1869.) The first act was repealed by the second, and the third act was an extension of the second. The first act covered specific ports and military districts, not necessarily specific prostitutes. The second act covered those same places, plus more, plus it created a group with special powers to enforce it. The third act extended the second's time limit, and covered more areas. This article would benefit greatly from the addition of material from the Parliamentary Debates 1864-1886, Jospehine Butler's Reminiscences of a Great Crusade, (her memoirs of her fight against the Acts), Paul McHugh's Prostitution and Victorian Social Reform, and *especially* Judith Walkowitz's Prostitution and Victorian Society. I have never seen any evidence to support the article's claim that women were arrested for the purposes of being coerced into reporting on their friends and neighbors, so I would definitely like a citation to see where that information is coming from. I'm not an expert by any means, but I am writing about the opposition movement to the Contagious Diseases Acts for my Senior paper right now, and have to say that I am quite comfortable with much of the material surrounding the Acts by now. This article could also still use quite a bit of editing and reorganization. <ph34rtehk4t@gmail.com> 24.159.213.56 05:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should edit the part about Intimidation. What was actually said was "By these (CD Acts), in certain towns containing military bases, any woman suspected of being a prostitute could be stopped and forced to undergo a genital inspection to discover if she had a venereal disease. If she did not submit willingly, she could be arrested and brought before a magistrate. If she was found to be infected, she could be effectively imprisoned in a 'lock' hospital." http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cgi-bin/search2?coll_id=6838&inst_id=65. The article looks like a (probably unwitting) embellishment or misunderstanding. Tractorboy60 16:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed cleanup tag, but work remains

I've added section headings and performed some text edits. The article is still light on information:

India: Re-enacted? When was it enacted and repealed? How is UK law relevant to India? Expert comment needed in the article on this
Other nations: incomplete and more information needed
Areas: What areas were relevant? Expert commentary with a list would be beneficial.

Adding an expert tag to see if one will come and expand this

Fiddle Faddle 06:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

huge unstated assumptions

"It was because of men that there was demand for prostitutes, "

Hmm... this is like saying "because of blacks there is a lot of crime in the ghetto"

"As military men were discouraged from marriage and homosexual behaviour was criminal, prostitution was considered a necessary evil."

Only because it was illegal men did not engage in homosexual behavior? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomtul2 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Explain chatnam

The article currently refers to a "chatnam prostitute". What does chatnam mean? Should it have a capital C, and is it a misspelling of a place name? Trafford09 (talk) 23:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source

There's a fascinating account here: [1] Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Contagious Diseases Acts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116112921/http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Wcontagious.htm to http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Wcontagious.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs more information added

This Article is not expansive enough, and each of the 3 CD acts need their own subsections added to the contents, detailing exactly what each of them comprised of. There is no data in the CD acts section to describe the forced internal examinations that women underwent, and to make it clear and concise as to how each successive law expanded upon its previous limitations, stating things such as "The Act of 1864 stated that women found to be infected could be interned in locked hospitals for up to three months, a period gradually extended to one year with the 1869 Act." is not good enough. This article needs to be much more detailed, precise and informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtemisLogic (talk • contribs) 04:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]