Talk:Committee of 300
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]Before my edits get reverted back to "theory". Nothing about this group is theory. While it may not be an incorporated organization of people enough verifiable references exist to prove it's not a theory.
If anything it's a label given to this group of people.Woods01 (talk) 19:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Not really. All I can find is the old Walter Rathenau quote and an author saying that some one told him that a group called the Olympians that were the Council of 300. Not enough.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 23:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Dr. John Coleman held a speech concerning documents handed to him while he was serving in Africa. They were "Eyes only" documents which referred to a group he found himself covertly working for. He though he was there stopping the spread of communism, but the documents revealed he was in the employment of The Committee of 300, also known as The Olympians. His book, The Conspirators Hierarchy: The Committee of 300 is the basis for his talk available at the link below. The book is freely available also in a link below.
Book: https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhinoBooks:3/The-Conspirators-Hierarchy-The-Committee-of-300-by-John-Coleman:a Presentation: https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/the-committee-of-300-explosive-lecture-dr-john-coleman/2A00:23C7:5981:A01:8554:86C2:233E:D090 (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Why is this book not mentioned and referenced in the article and why does John Coleman himself not also have an article? 81.37.57.210 (talk) 22:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Vagueness
[edit]this is all extremely vague. The original authors need to elaborate and clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.112.140.90 (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Is the CIA a reputable source?
[edit]Indeed the fact that wikipedia labels this a theory shows what a joke it has become. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.154.119.109 (talk) 11:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Family Guy Guy (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- No it is not. 95.42.26.40 (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class Alternative Views articles
- Low-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
- Start-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Start-Class Jewish history-related articles
- Low-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- Start-Class Discrimination articles
- Low-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- Start-Class European history articles
- Low-importance European history articles
- All WikiProject European history pages