Talk:Collapse of Hotel New World

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 15, 2013.

Thomas Mulleary

Can anyone actually verify the existence and involvement of Thomas Mulleary in the rescue and the resulting purported nomination of an OBE? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:C320:B6B0:E4A1:512D:8AF0:EBE0 (talk) 17:39, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

The National Geographic Channel program on this "Seconds from Disaster" http://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/watch/program_details.aspx?id_program=7798 says the cause was a miscalculation by the architects who failed to build the building to support the "Dead load" -- the building itself, and only built it to support the "Live Load" -- its contents and additions to the building.

The first two columns to fail were near the nightclub on a low floor of the building. Personally, I wonder if the bass vibrations from the music amplification system could have been a factor.

The official sites from Singapore state that "shoddy workmanship and corner cutting by the contractors were responsible for the sudden collapse of the building." This seems to run contrary to the National Geographic program's conclusion which concludes that the materials and construction were sound.

What is the truth?? 71.131.47.66 23:49, 10 October 2005

According to Seconds From Disaster tv series, a range of potential causes were tested-for by investigators after the collapse. Generally shoddy workmanship was tested-for early on as rescuers has reported that the concrete was very weak and crumbly as they tunnelled through the ruins and drilled though concrete slabs. Tests showed the concrete was to proper world standards and contruction was also fine. The concrete crumbled as it had been so heavily fractured during the collapse itself. Your comments re "live load" are correct. The architect accounted for the "live load" (weight of people, furniture, fixtures and fittings), while forgetting to factor in the "dead load" (weight of the building itself). For its entire 15 year life the building could not support itself. Nothing to do with nightclub basslines though. Collapse was only a matter of time. OK, edits to now go in the main page! Asa01 20:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was a documentary shown on Mediacorp Channel 5 about the Hotel New World Collapse.It states that a victim told the rescuers to rescue her friend before rescuing her.It also stated that her friend survived but the victim died.Is that the truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.13.2 (talk) 11:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Media section

I'm not sure on Wikipedia policy on this, but surely it's not 'standard' to say clips of the show featuring an event have been uploaded onto YouTube and to 'publicise' it in an article? Despite the uploading of the show being useful to those wishing to see a dramatisation, surely it brings about copyright issues and should maybe be removed from the article? 94.192.52.244 (talk) 15:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collapse of Hotel New World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070816022001/http://ourstory.asia1.com.sg/dream/life/headline/lifh12.html to http://ourstory.asia1.com.sg/dream/life/headline/lifh12.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]