Talk:Collaborative editing

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Collaborative editing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Metaphor/allusion

File:Kanazawa-C-3209.jpg

This statue is entitled Hashire ("Running"). The the non-specific figure illustrates a Wikipedia-like progress

This image was deleted by Edward:

diff 15:36, 16 August 2009 Edward (2,527 bytes) (remove photograph, it doesn't make sense)

I would have thought this image makes a useful contribution. In a process of restoring this image, I wonder what sort of rasonable argument, if any, would be perceived as persuasive? --Tenmei (talk) 21:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how this figure illustrates a Wikipedia-like progress. Edward (talk) 10:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Time for a spring clean

Greetings! I think there is a set of articles here that need some solid work to bring them up to standard - we have a group ( Collaborative_authorship, collaborative editing, and collaborative fiction ) of articles that are either very short, repetitive, or just not up to Wikipedia standard - I'm willing to invest some time to make this work - are there any other active editors looking at these pages who would like to be involved? I'm posting this message on the three (currently) relevant pages. I like to be quite bold with these things and we can all play with the revert cycle with no ego. I'll give it a week in case there are lurking editors who want to get involved and do the discussion thing and will get stuck in. Pflat (talk) 09:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

difference to collaborative writing?

can anyone enlighten me if there are any true differences between the concepts of "collaborative writing" and "collaborative editing"? because people sure seem to use them synonymously. if not, I would suggest to redirect this page to "collaborative writing" and merge any non-redundant content into that article. --FaFlo (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collaborative editing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927055808/http://classweb.gmu.edu/nccwg/collab.htm to http://classweb.gmu.edu/nccwg/collab.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]