Jump to content

Talk:Cold-core low

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCold-core low has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 2, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Upper-level low?

[edit]

Is this the same as an upper-level low? If so that should be mentioned. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's mentioned a couple times that cold-core lows strengthen with height, but not explicitly since they can have a related low level circulation. You think it should be made more obvious? Is there a way it could be worded more clearly without being incorrect? Thegreatdr (talk) 23:39, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, just that you see all the time references to upper-level lows. If ULL and cold-core low are one in the same, that would be great, as I'm often looking for a place to link for that. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I still think there should be a mention in the lede that the "upper-level lows" so often read about in tropical cyclone literature refer to this. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:10, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Cold-core low/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just getting thing set up here, I'll have the review of this article completed within the next hour or so. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


  • "...is a cyclone aloft which has an associated cold pool of air residing at high altitude within the troposphere above the Earth's surface." - Three instances of a higher altitude in the same sentence (aloft, high altitude, above the Earth's Surface). I believe cutting out the last four words would retain the same meaning and resolve the issue.
  • Second and third sentences of the lead both start with "It"
  • Since the article redlinks, I'm a bit lost (just reading the lead as separate piece) as to what an East coast low is. Not sure if there is anything that can be done about that in the lead alone though.
  • Is there a synonym you can use for cold-core low?
  • Link outflow to Outflow (meteorology)
  • Although there is an article for it, it's probably best to give a one sentence summary of what a thermal wind is.
  • "Due to this, the center shows an area of thickness minimum." - No idea what that means, aside from the slight oxymoron
  • "Most cloud cover and precipitation in association with cold lows occurs during the daylight hours." How come? What's preventing this from happening at night?
  • "...(SST) gradient along the east coast of continents, such as Asia, the United States, South Africa, and Australia..." - As impressive of a nation we are, we do share the continent with others ;) (United States should be changes to North America) Also, did you intentionally mean South Africa the country or the region of Southern Africa?
  • "...they form in tandem with blocking anticyclones at higher latitude..." - Change to "anticyclones at a higher latitude" or "anticyclones at higher latitudes"
  • "East coast lows can persist for up to a week." - Nothing wrong with this bit but it just feels somewhat out of place....if you believe it to be where it should be I have no problem with that.
  • You switch the capitalization of "East coast low" to "east coast low", needs consistency
  • "wave heights over 10 metres (33 ft) in height" - redundancy.
  • La Nina -> La Niña
  • Add (TUTT) after tropical upper tropospheric trough since you use the acronym
  • "Tropical cyclone movement can also be influenced by TUTT cells within 1,700 kilometres (920 nmi) of their position, which can lead to non-climatological tropical cyclone tracks." - redundancy at the end, one of the two needs to be reworded to avoid this. Change the conversion to statute miles, it's more well-known that nautical miles. Additionally, what is a non-climatological path (clarification for readers not fluent in TCs)?
  • "...50-metre depth..." - imperial conversion in parenthesis needed
  • 6.5 °C/km - (°F/mi) is needed for this and the following instance

All in all this is a good read. That said, there are several quirks in the article that need to be addressed before I can pass it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That should resolve the issues. Let me know if a second round of fixes is needed. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, it looks like everything is all good. I'm passing the article, congrats! Cyclonebiskit (talk) 12:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cold-core low. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do all high level lows have a cold core

[edit]

Equating upper-level low with cold-core low seems to imply all high level lows have a cold core. Could we clarify if this is true, and why ? What causes them to form ? eg is it just a high level eddy that coincidentally contains colder air, or does the cold core cause the formation/rotation, or does the rotation cool the core ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]