Talk:Coffee culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Culture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Coffee break was copied or moved into Coffee culture with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2021 and 16 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pgeisen13.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

wow: this article is terribad.

testify —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.48.25.60 (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hehehe, terribad, cool word. Yes it could be improved methinks...Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this an advertisement for Starbucks? -- 140.112.218.130 (talk) 08:09, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement

Some topics from the coffee article should be listed here in the coffee culture article. Not to compare but, see the tea and tea culture articles. icetea8 (talk) 04:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Cafe au laiters" and "Espressonites"

People that participate in cafe culture are sometimes referred to as "cafe au laiters" and "espressonites"

This weasely sentence has been tagged as such for over two years. Anecdotally, I've never once heard either of those terms used in any way outside of that sentence in this article, and I've tended coffee bar for a good handful of years. None of the other baristas I know have encountered those terms, either. Though I understand that my anecdotal lack of evidence is not proof that these terms aren't, in fact, common enough to warrant mention, I also understand that this here is Wikipedia, and there has been no evidence presented to support their inclusion. Because it has been tagged for so long without being readdressed, I'm going to remove it. Feel free to throw it back in if you disagree with the decision and can cite valid references. ☉ nbmatt 01:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne's coffee culture

Fuck off, Melbourne. Take your hand off your tool for a second and quit stroking. Yes, the coffee culture is good in Melbourne, but no more so than it is in Brisbane and Sydney. The coffee culture in Australia is excellent, this isn't a Melbourne-thing. Christ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.86.193.89 (talk) 23:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coffee culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090520144944/http://www.stoughtonwi.com/coffee.shtml to http://www.stoughtonwi.com/coffee.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Coffee break in Belgrade, Serbia" photo caption

This photo strikes me as completely pointless. The main text tells us "a coffee break ... is a routine social gathering", but the picture shows small parts of one person's body (hands and part of the torso, not even a face) and a single cup. The picture could have been taken anywhere, and tells us nothing meaningful about coffee breaks in Belgrade, or indeed anywhere else - we can't even see if the cup contains coffee, except for the word "KAFA", which is not only illegible without enlargement, but rather untypically for Serbia is written in the Latin alphabet (the Cyrillic form would be "КАФА" - however, I now see that "Grand KAFA" is a Serbian coffee manufacturer, and does seem to use the Latin alphabet, perhaps to look more cosmopolitan?). I think the definition should be changed, for I can have a coffee break without anyone else being around, and without it being routine. And if a photograph is going to be provided at all - I don't really see the need - it should surely be more informative.213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serious layout damage

Recent edits have screwed up most of the photos which are now in the wronge places. Two photos of one café have also been added (promo?). I wrote to the editor since I cannot figure out what they did nor how to fix it. SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes clearly promotional... Now be so kind as to point out which two photos are of one café. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could try if you explain your edits including "you're not going to be able to see the text you want to change when you go into the raw because its not there" - quoting you on your talk page. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both of the photos here of the same café were previously also visible in this article, as you probably know, while you're using "you're not going to be able to see the text you want to change when you go into the raw because its not there" - whbich is a complete mystery to me. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Excerpt and given this edit [1] it doesn't appear to be a complete mystery to you. Do you currently have any issues with the layout of the page? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:22, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No.

WP:Excerpt should be used very carefully, as warned on that page about disadvantages. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinating, so a day ago you didn't know it existed and now you're an expert on its use? Would you also be interested to know that pictures being forced down is not serious layout damage? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please acquaint yourself with basic does and don'ts for article talk pages here, such as "Comment on content, not on the contributor or It's the edits that matter, not the editor: Keep the discussions focused on the topic of the talk page, rather than on the editors participating." --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The irony of course is that this entire comment is about me and not the content... Which you can't say of mine because I did comment on the content of your claims (that pictures being forced down does serious damage to the layout). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]