Talk:Cobourg and Peterborough Railway

Trains Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	July 20, 2021

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

and or &?

Title: Cobourg and Peterborough

Lede: Cobourg & Peterborough

The Wooden Causeway: Cobourg and Peterborough

Infobox: Cobourg & Peterborough.

Which is it? -- JackofOz (talk) 04:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One is a short form of the other. Generally I use & when the entire name is not being spelled out. Maury Markowitz (talk) 19:31, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki norms established by WikiProject Trains as far back as 2005 are that the article title uses "and" for railroad company names with redirects for the title name with an ampersand. Within the article the body text can use ampersands, but the article title uses the word "and" instead. Slambo (Speak) 15:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cobourg and Peterborough Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.railwaypages.com/pdf/The%20Midland%20Railway%20of%20Canada.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131126224223/http://railwaypages.com/index.php?tmp=2&id=21 to http://www.railwaypages.com/index.php?tmp=2&id=21

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cobourg, Peterborough & Marmora Railway and Mining Company

Blairon -> Blairton: please ignore my "see Talk". I wasn't sure I could fix the link, but it was easy!Mathyeti (talk) 17:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]