Jump to content

Talk:Coat of arms of Switzerland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

18 USC 708 (What is this about?)

[edit]

Does anyone know why there is a special provision in U.S. law to prevent companies and people from using the Swiss coat of arms? It seems odd it is singled out.

Whoever, whether a corporation, partnership, unincorporated company, association, or person within the United States, willfully uses as a trade mark, commercial label, or portion thereof, or as an advertisement or insignia for any business or organization or for any trade or commercial purpose, the coat of arms of the Swiss Confederation, consisting of an upright white cross with equal arms and lines on a red ground, or any simulation thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
This section shall not make unlawful the use of any such design or insignia which was lawful on August 31, 1948. (18 U.S.C. § 708)

There may be some article-worthy content in this somewhere. — Eoghanacht talk 18:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@Eoghanacht: I saw your question ten years later. ;-) I'll try to explain.
First you have to know that the Flag of Switzerland is the inverse of the Red Cross which is used for people how help.
Many other countries has a spacial law for the Red Cross for Example Germany: § 125 and Austria de:Rotkreuzgesetz. In this law normally the Swiss Flag is also protected.
The US law was established 1948. 1949 USA signed the Geneva Conventions. I'm not 100% sure but I had in my mind that every state how signed the Geneva Conventions need a special law for the Red Cross.
Here an article about "Explainer: why protecting the Red Cross emblem matters".
A list of some countries with a specific law.
Country Law(s) Red Cross Red Crescent Red Crystal Red Lion with Sun Red Shield of David Flag of Switzerland
Parties how signed the Geneva Conventions Convention (I) §53 §53 §53 §53 §53 §53 §53
 Austria Rotkreuzgesetz §8. (1) a) §8. (1) b) §8. (1) c) §8. (1) b) No §8. (2)
 Germany §125 §125 (1) No No No No §125 (2)
 Netherlands §435 §435c §435c §435c §435c §435c §435d
 Switzerland 232.22 & 232.21 §1 §12 §12 §12 No 232.21
 United States 18 U.S.C. § 706, 18 U.S.C. § 706a & 18 U.S.C. § 708 §706 §706a (a) §706a (a) No No §708
I hope I was able to explain why there is a special law. If you have further questions please ask. --Malo95 (talk) 15:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

example plate

[edit]

I am not sure whether it is accurate to show an example plate which actually exists and which may easily be connected to a person via the internet. (why not use 000 000 instead?) Marcel.kummer (talk) 13:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Coat of arms of Switzerland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]