Talk:Chuvash Wikipedia

Wikipedia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Language & literature / Science & education / Mass media Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the mass media in Russia task force.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Category:Wikipedia articles licensed under the GNU Free Document License

I see no reason why the article should be in this category. The original creator just added the category GFDL to the article and the category was later renamed. The article was created in December 2009 and at that time the users had to agree to both GFDL and Cc-by-sa-3.0. So any edits in the article is cc-by-sa-3.0 too. I see no original sources that may only be licensed GFDL. If there are they are not valid on Wikipedia. MGA73 (talk) 13:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]