Talk:Chris Dold
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Legal Issues
[edit]Sexual assault charge
Hi I've been including a section in this article about a sexual assault trial which reads as follows:
In 2009, Dold was charged by an 18-year-old woman of sexual assault after letting himself in to her student residence at Queen's University [6]. After going to trial in April 2011 [7], Dold was acquitted of the charge in Kingston's Superior Court of Justice [8].
The section continues to be section blanked and I'd like to discuss this here. Is the sexual assault charge considered unworthy of inclusion on wikipedia? Is the number of details that I've included too much? I do believe that it warrants inclusion on this article to begin with, considering that it achieved significant local attention (at least as much attention as Dold's initial inclusion on wikipedia warrants by sourcing). Can we come to some consensus about what should be included, if anything at all? Please respond. Thank you. -Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Achapman2009 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with AndyTheGrump's response to your question on Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests. The information you are trying to add would be about 1/3 of the article. This one third of the article is about something that the court said the prosecution didn't prove he did it. There is definitely to much weight given to that incident. GB fan (talk) 13:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chris Dold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.internationalsailingacademy.com/chris.php - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725040055/https://event-manager.compete-at.com/Manager/event/results.do?eid=2576 to https://event-manager.compete-at.com/Manager/event/results.do?eid=2576
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110207162544/http://doldsailing.com/ to http://www.doldsailing.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)