Talk:Chief of Space Operations

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chief of Space Operations article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Space (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Space, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.SpaceWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceTemplate:WikiProject SpaceSpace

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Merge?

I created Office of the Chief of Space Operations due to an apparent need for the page according to {{United States Space Force}}. However, I'm not sure exactly why the two pages need to be split. There's only a single secondary source discussing the Office of the Chief of Space Operations. I have no objections if anyone wants to implement a merge of the stub. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:47, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think we should hold off on merging (the Space Force was only founded a few days ago) – we are probably going to see a lot more sources on the Office of the CSO once it starts to take off and the content will likely be very different than the CSO page. Keep in mind the USAF Chief of Staff has a different page than the Air Staff. Garuda28 (talk) 01:58, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We could just redirect it for now per WP:WOOD. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:00, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merge - The Office of the Chief of Space Operations is analogous to the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, which redirects to Chief of Naval Operations#Office of the Chief of Naval Operations. Considering that the CNO position is over 100 years old, the scope for expansion of the CSO article is probably quite small. I haven't checked the other service chief articles, but I wouldn't expect them to be much larger either. - BilCat (talk) 13:58, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@BilCat: I'll probably just say that just because Office of the Chief of Naval Operations doesn't exist at the moment, does not mean it could never possibly exist. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:47, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant. :) - BilCat (talk) 18:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merge There isn't really a precedent for this, as there is no equivalent article for the other branches. As noted above, this article was likely created to resolve a red link in the template. --Puzzledvegetable^{Is it teatime already?} 03:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The precedence actually exists through the Air Staff (United States), which is the equivalent body for the Air Force. It could be split out later though. Garuda28 (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I concur that it could always be split out later, but for now, there's no need for two stubby articles on basically the same topic. Since all the participants agree, and this isn't a formal merge discussion, would either of you like to do the merging? I'd do it myself, but I'm "retired". :) - BilCat (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Garuda28! :D –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

This article was originally created (by User:Garuda28) using the day-month-year (DMY) date format, for which he added a {{Use dmy dates}} tag at that time. This was in accordance with Wikipedia practice for US-related military articles, as the US military generally used the DMY format.

This is explicitly allowed in the MOS per WP:MILFORMAT: In some topic areas, the customary format differs from the usual national one: for example, articles on the modern US military, including US military biographical articles, use day-before-month, in accordance with US military usage.

Per MOS:DATETIES, If an article has evolved using predominantly one date format, this format should be used throughout the article, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on the article's talk page.

Please do not change the existing DMY format to MDY without a clear consensus here to do so. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 20:32, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]