Talk:Chicago Fire (TV series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chicago Fire (TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firefighting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Media franchises Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

e KAYLA’s Notebook

Encyclopaedic Tone...

Ok, so seeing as an article tag has been added on the article. I figure we should all come together and discuss about what ContinueWithCaution means by the tone.

I for one, see no real problem with it. But am open to discussion about it. MisterShiney ✉ 20:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I don't really see what he's getting out. It seems encyclopedic enough to me. -- SchrutedIt08 (talk) 21:03, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, its layout and form/wording seems the same as other TV pages I have come across. If he hadnt been an experienced editor I probably would have removed it. I put a Talkback with a link here on his talk page. Hopefully he can be a little more specific. MisterShiney ✉ 21:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cast Section reduction

I would think the best way is to remove the summary of each cast member as that can be read in the separate article List of Chicago Fire characters. Only leave the name of each only. Just leave it at one line per person.

Also the cast table of season appears could be move to the Episode list or section. --Ecto~enwiki (talk) 19:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Readers shouldn't be forced to go to another article to find out information, so there should be a very brief summary for each, at least name and role. However WP:TVCAST says that summary information should be presented in prose format, and discussions at various pages, including WT:TV have never supported cast tables in main series articles, so that should exist only in the characters article. --AussieLegend (✉) 19:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chicago Fire (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chicago Fire (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monica Raymund's likely departure

What do you think of this news about Monica Raymund's departure of the show?

http://tvline.com/2018/05/13/chicago-fire-monica-raymund-leaving-season-7-dawson-not-returning/ BattleshipMan (talk) 17:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation and no hard evidence. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's a good chance it will be proven later on. We better keep an eye out. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some proof to Raymund's departure. http://deadline.com/2018/05/monica-raymund-exit-chicago-fire-six-seasons-1202391346/ BattleshipMan (talk) 17:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:One Chicago (TV franchise)#Requested move 9 October 2018

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:One Chicago (TV franchise)#Requested move 9 October 2018. TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KAYLA’S Notebook

The cast list section needs a rewrite, it is written backwards by people who have watched the show and know all that has happened. The cast section should be written for new readers and viewers and first start by introducing the characters, and only then explaining that characters such as Casey later achieved the rank of Captain. I don't have time to fix it myself just this minute but I hope to come back around to it soon but if anyone else wants to fix it before then that would be great too. -- 109.79.166.207 (talk) 04:38, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone rewrote the information about Chief Boden and put information about season 10 right at the start instead of adding it after, so I made a few small fixes. The section still needs a substantial rewrite to fix all the basic problems and get it into a coherent and chronological order and make it better for all readers. WP:TVCAST -- 109.79.170.230 (talk) 23:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few more fixes, there's still more to do. It seems that List of Chicago Fire characters also suffers from a lot of the same chronology problems, with information from later seasons put right up front, instead first introducing the characters and then after that explaining what happens. I guess with new people starting to edit Wikipedia all the time this sort of thing is going to happen a lot, but imagine you were trying to explain the show to a friend, start at the beginning, explain for example that a character trying to become a firefighter before explaining what happens next, you wouldn't start by saying "Former firefighter". Unfortunately parts of the Cast section and List of Chicago Fire characters were written in the worst possible order, making them only useful to people who have already watched the show and totally unhelpful to new viewers who have come to the show late, and want to get an introduction to the characters, or catch-up on some but not all details. More fixes and rewriting still needed. TLDR: keep it simple, write in linear chronological order. -- 109.78.199.18 (talk) 21:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This sort of thing has happened before and will likely happen again, some editors get distracted by what just happened instead of viewing the series as a whole. It is easier to see things in perspective when a show has finished, for example take a look at cast section from the medical show Code_Black_(TV_series) and also take a look at the discussion and misunderstandings Talk:Code_Black_(TV_series) that happened before the section was eventually rewritten into something that is fairly coherent and useful to readers. The characters in that show start as interns and the ranks and positions change every season. It is important to include significant changes that occur during the series and not leave out important details, but they should not be put first or replace the basic character introductions. -- 109.78.196.169 (talk) 13:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Chicago Fire (TV series)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Chicago Fire (TV series)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "entertainment2016":

From List of Chicago P.D. episodes: de Moraes, Lisa (May 26, 2016). "Full 2015–16 TV Season Series Rankings: 'Blindspot', 'Life In Pieces' & 'Quantico' Lead Newcomers". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved May 26, 2016.
From Must See TV: "Full 2015–16 TV Season Series Rankings". Deadline Hollywood. May 26, 2015. Retrieved May 26, 2015.
From Law & Order: Special Victims Unit: de Moraes, Lisa (May 29, 2016). "Full 2015–16 TV Season Series Rankings: 'Blindspot', 'Life In Pieces' & 'Quantico' Lead Newcomers". Deadline Hollywood. Archived from the original on May 28, 2016. Retrieved May 26, 2016.
From The Voice (American TV series): "Full 2015–16 TV Season Series Rankings". Deadline Hollywood. May 26, 2015. Retrieved May 26, 2015.
From List of Chicago Med episodes: de Moraes, Lisa (May 26, 2016). "Full 2015–16 TV Season Series Rankings: 'Blindspot', 'Life In Pieces' & 'Quantico' Lead Newcomers". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved May 26, 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]