Jump to content

Talk:Chemical attack on Behbahan battalion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possibly lacking verifiability

[edit]

On an initial search, I have had some trouble finding adequate sources for:

I realise that there may be variant spellings for these, and I also realize that good sources may not necessary be in English, or even Latin script. However, perhaps it is slightly disturbing that the article is in English only, rather than also having an article in the language of the cited "sources"? There are also some possible internal inconsistencies, such as the battalion name: is it the Iranian Behbehan Battalion or the Fadjr Battalion? FeatherPluma (talk) 19:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemical attack on Behbahan battalion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]