Talk:Chapel Allerton

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Chapel Allerton is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Leeds

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leeds, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Leeds on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LeedsWikipedia:WikiProject LeedsTemplate:WikiProject LeedsLeeds articles

Untitled

Removed the three paragraphs that were added in the latest addition as they were nothing more than polemic and brought nothing to the article. The formatting also left something to be desired. --Si42 22:14, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

True, it wasn't a great piece of writing, written in great haste. I do think I have a valid point though. House prices have forced a lot of people out of the area and the community has suffered because of this. Swanky cafes and bars and an influx of young professionals are not necessarily what make a real community. I find the whole 'Chapel A' stuff really twee and the whole marketing of Chapel Allerton as a trendy place to live a bit depressing and snobbish, I also can't stick pompous radio four comedy game shows like 'Just a Minute' and Betty's tea shops really annoy me as well. I do, however, genuinely like wheat beer.

Ha, yeah I'm not entirely sure what makes a 'real community'... I do sympathise with your point, but it would have made more sense here - I don't really like the last couple of sentences as they stand either (they do feel a bit like an ad placed by an estate agent). I also happen to hate Betty's as well.--Si42 21:33, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

How is Chapel Allerton any more bohemian than any other area in the city?

The dot on the map needs moving right a bit. I don't know how to do this.

Dominion Cinema

I have removed the image (which is readily available at the reference given). There are loads of pictures on Leodis, but we should only use them if they add something. Chapel Allerton has so many current buildings worthy of showing, but I think that for an encylopedia this must be limited and selective. The Dominion caused a bit of a stir in 1911 by just being a picture house and thus modern and thus unwelcome, but I do not seriously think it is sufficiently important to be included. Chemical Engineer (talk) 18:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would be inclined to disagree. The Dominion is a significant both historically and architecturally to the Chapel Allerton area. While Chapel Allerton stil has noteworthy buildings, many of an art deco style, there are none so large as the former Dominion. I would also argue there should be some variety of what the page shows, at present it shows mainly pubs, churches and images of the centre of Chapel Allerton. I would say this building has more signifiance then brick built and frankly quite ugly single story Methodist chapels. I would however say that this should be brought perhaps to broader consensus, in the meantime, could no one remove the image as it is on a fair use licence, and should anyone remove it, then this breaches its fair use. Ta, Mtaylor848 (talk) 16:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Straw poll, use File:Dominion Cinema art here?

NOTE: PLEASE DO NOT POST IMAGE HERE AS IT VIOLATES ITS FAIR USE LICENCE, PLEASE USE THE LINK.

YES

NO

Lead image

I have changed the lead image, however it sometimes has trouble loading up onto the page. I was going to change it back again, but noticed there was a problem with many images, previously OK (See images on the Spanish Chapel Allerton page, for instance, many which work fine on the English page). The lead image seems to be working on other pages which I have tried it on. I am assuming this is just a blip as commons is also playing up, so am leaving the image in place. If the problem persists, I will revert it. Mtaylor848 (talk) 15:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have had this problem before with no solution. Images which work elsewhere do not always work in the infobox.Chemical Engineer (talk) 17:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By trial and error I find that increasing the infobox to at least 400px allows the picture to appear. (it is panoramic). However, I suggest it would be better used even wider outside the infobox.Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to move the image out of the infobox as anything over 240px distorts the infobox. Keith D (talk) 00:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Chapel Allerton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chapel Allerton/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

~~Requires infobox~~ Done
Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Switch existing references to use one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 11:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:04, 31 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 11:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chapel Allerton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chapel Allerton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.jiwire.com/hotspot-detail.htm?location_id=1470365
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312031637/http://www.secretleeds.com/forum/Messages.aspx?ThreadID=103 to http://www.secretleeds.com/forum/Messages.aspx?ThreadID=103
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.leeds.gov.uk/files/Internet2007/2008/43/chapel%20allerton%20caa%20adopted.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]