Talk:Ceedo
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-09-26. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Does the company still exist?
[edit]I followed the homepage link here. The site exists, but the logo differs and the content seems to be some sort of ~content farm, presumably for ad revenue or affiliate sales? Not sure if the company has gone under, been hacked, or is just neglecting its domains? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.232.156.238 (talk) 20:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
This is notable!
[edit]Ceedo Personal comes pre-bundled on portable storage devices from a variety of manufacturers, including Seagate, Verbatim, Maxell, ExcelStor, Venzero and others.
This, as well as what the software can do, really indicates notability. OlavN 07:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
In addition to what Olav said, a search of Nexis reveals that the product has been reviewed by The New York Times, The Boston Globe, and The Jerusalem Post. [i'm not a registered user, but this is me http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty.php?lid=3797&display_one=1] 10:21AM EST, 9/27/07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.97.198.32 (talk) 14:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
A search for Ceedo in Google returns 521,000 entries. I think that makes it a 'notable' app. How would you measure the 'notability' of an app? Well, Notepad2 has 568,000 entries on Google... and other apps like DreamKana have only 673 entries and no one doubts they are 'notable' apps. So, why you think Ceedo is "not notable"? -- Wayfarer.es 11:25, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ceedo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090301101729/http://ceedo.com/company/jun-6-2008-ceedo-launches-an-application-virtualization-solution-for-the-enterprise.html to http://www.ceedo.com/company/jun-6-2008-ceedo-launches-an-application-virtualization-solution-for-the-enterprise.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206011142/http://ceedo.com/company/aug-05-2008-ceedo-announces-ceedo-enterprise-for-citrix-xenapp.html to http://www.ceedo.com/company/aug-05-2008-ceedo-announces-ceedo-enterprise-for-citrix-xenapp.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 1 August 2017 (UTC)