Talk:Cautes and Cautopates

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cautes and Cautopates article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Cautes and Cautopates. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Cautes and Cautopates at the Reference desk.

Religion

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rome

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Identification

The identification of Cautes and Cautopates with the sunrise and sunset is quite questionable. As per David Ulansey and others, they represent the Equinoxes. Their appearance in the Tauroctony, which is believed to represent an allegory of the Precession of the Equinoxes, is precisely to be the cadre where all the other constellations are represented.

I think this steps over the line between what is in fact the case (on matters so difficult to resolve) and what an encyclopedia should say (which is to describe the positions held by professional scholars and leave it at that). What we need to do is reflect (and reference!) the opinions either way. If you would add the Ulansey claim and reference it, that would be helpful. Roger Pearse (talk) 13:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the Ulansey reference for his understanding of these two characters -- but in fact the entire book is a reference for his hypothesis that the discovery of the precession of the equinoxes by Hipparchus in 128 BC led to the elevation of Mithras as a cosmic force and thus to his cult. RobLandau (talk) 15:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelled Reference

Reference (2) on this page has misspelled the author's name by omitting one s. The correct citation would be "Manfred Clauss, The Roman Cult of Mithras, tr. Richard Gordon. Edinburgh University Press (2000) p. 95" 128.239.201.207 (talk) 19:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]