Talk:Carl Davidson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

This article was tagged by a self-described deletionist from the UK. Anyone familiar with US politics and history would understand the significance of the VP and National Sec of SDS. As well as Progressives for Obama. --Gary1234 (talk) 18:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of an encyclopaedia is to explain things clearly. Your article is close to incomprehensible and entirely without any independent references. I did think the article was a hoax because the link to Committees of Correspondence points to an 18th century organisation, however I realised that this was a mistake in the link and took the "disputed" tag off and asked for clarification instead. The other tags are correct and appropriate. Instead of addressing the issues I see the above comment. This is not constructive. Please address the issues. My status as a deletionist as irrelevant as I have not suggested deleting the article. I may do so if the article does not improve over next few weeks.

Rather than dwell on that possibility, here is what I think needs doing to rescue the article:

Need some independent, secondary sources of reference. These need to demonstrate notability and provide verifiability. If the article is true then this should not be too hard.
Need some context so that the article is comprehensible to a general reader, even one from the UK.
Need to follow the links and check that they go to the correct places. If they are wrong then fix them.
Need basic biographical details such as year and place of birth.
Remove or clarify the claim that he was "one of the first American citizens to visit China" as this is nonsense. Americans have visited China for many centuries.

Note: If I do decide to request deletion it will be through that AfD process, which will allow time for discussion. I am not able to delete articles myself, not that I would want to. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected the (internal) link to "Committees of Correspondence"; and added several (external) links.0XQ (talk) 02:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carl Davidson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090220233739/http://www.zmag.org:80/zspace/carldavidson to http://www.zmag.org/zspace/carldavidson

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]