Talk:Cardiocentric hypothesis

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 June 2019 by reviewer Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs).

History of Science

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rene Decartes - pineal gland theory

René Descartes Should a ref or link to that theory be added

Religious texts

should this article include various religious books such as The Quran bible etc

Eg Quran 5:7, 8:43, 11:5, 31:23, 35:38, 39:7, 42:24, 57:6, 64:4, 67:13

Bible https://dailyverses.net/heart ? Yesihavereadit (talk) 16:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the draft section I have done in my sandbox

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Yesihavereadit/sandbox Yesihavereadit (talk) 07:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article title and subject matter

The definition of the "cardiocentric hypothesis" appears to be written in weasel words - is the idea that the heart influences thought synonymous with the idea that the heart *is* the source of cognition?

I think we should clarify the difference between these ideas much more clearly.

Edit: I've decided to be bold and add a new source. I've modified the introduction for accuracy. Zoozoor (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]