Talk:Caenagnathoidea
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Oviraptorosauria
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion no support to avoid or dispute the merge. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 05:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Support: This article does not contain any relevant unique information because only a few taxa are within oviraptorosauria that are excluded from caenagnathoidea. Internal taxonomy of oviraptorosaurs has been controversial, as is stated in this article, so the exact makeup of this taxon is uncertain and may be subject to change in the near future (e.g. the inclusion of Caudipteryx or Avimimus). Any new information that could be added to expand this page would be equally applicable to the parent taxon (oviraptorosauria), so the existence of this article is completely superfluous. In fact, some of the text for the intro paragraph is copy and pasted from the other article. Therefore, I propose this page be merged into Oviraptorosauria and Caenagnathoidea be left as a redirect. --A Cynical Idealist (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Note this article has also been invoked as part of a large merge prposal discussion at WT:DINO. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 21:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)