Talk:CISPR 11
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The two sub-categories make no sense
[edit]The categorization of ISM equipment in the article begins as follows: "International standard EN 55011:2009 separates all equipment in two groups– Group 1 and Group 2, each group is subdivided in two classes– class 1 and class 2."
The next paragraphs then go on to describe "Class A" and "Class B". So which is it? "Class A" or "Class 1"? "Class B" or "Class 2"? Bill Wvbailey (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Seems most of the text on this page is a poor English translation of a Russian document. Might need some work! Mike (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- After the 1st sentence, the article is a word-for-word copy of the 1st source listed in External links. It should be rewritten, possibly using the second link, which I found by Googling CISPR 11. – Margin1522 (talk) 18:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)