Talk:Byng Arts Mini School

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Vancouver, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VancouverWikipedia:WikiProject VancouverTemplate:WikiProject VancouverVancouver
	This article is primarily related to the city of Vancouver

Canada: British Columbia / Education

	Canada portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Education in Canada.

Lord Bynd Secondary

This article was created as a split from Lord Byng Secondary School as the amount of relevant information exceeded article norms. Mkdw 21:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Election Controversy - why not include it?

Shouldn't different points of view be presented? Wikipedia should not only reflect the opinions of a particular editor.

The controversy over the election for president should be put back in. cyblord

It fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines. It cannot be referenced, was not the subject of any media attention, and really has little importance to the school itself. If you wish to create an article about that event you can try so, but I'm sure it will be deleted for failing WP:SPEEDY. Mkdw ^talk 04:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why cannot it be mentioned, it would explain why there are two, so a short explanation would be relevant. A113842 00:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Byngarts mascot.gif

Image:Byngarts mascot.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Byng Arts Mini School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]