Talk:Burmilla

Untitled

They're so cute! Hmm... I'm not very good at collecting info though. Frodo 11011 02:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I´ve a really big problem with the picture in the article. It looks more like a Tiffanie than a Burmilla. Also the body is not like a real good Burmilla! Greetings from Germany. Sanquist - Burmilla --217.229.23.70 07:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a Burmilla. It's my Burmilla. It came from a registered Burmilla breeder and from a family of show cats who have won various awards at cat shows. Really: it's a Burmilla.

—David Johnson [T|C] 10:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiffanies are never short coated. David's Burmilla is definitely a lot darker shaded than we are used to seeing in Blues, but it's a Blue nonetheless. SaucyWench (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has some serious flaws, one of them is the mention of the Australian Tiffanie, which is known as a Designer breed in difference to the Burmilla Longhair which is the natural variation of the Burmilla. Only one body in Australia has ever recognised the Australian Tiffanie.

Regarding the Burmilla coats, there are only short (Burmilla) and semi-long (Burmilla Longhair). There is no recognised coat length such as plush. A cat with a "plush" coat would be seriously hampered at a cat show if it were competing against cats displaying the correct coat length.

Greetings from Australia. Burabylla Burmillas. (¬¬¬¬)(Sorry, have a keyboard problem and can't do the squiggly things)

I agree with you about the Tiffanie mention - but I've left it in there for some clarity since Waratah recognises it and it's definitely used quite a lot in the USA, albeit lacking in standards and professional recognition, and as you say it's as a designer look. Unfortunately for we Burmilla breeders the name Tiffanie is sometimes better known than Burmilla.

As far as plush is concerned I've made it quite clear it's not recognised. However, people can and have shown plushes on the show bench in Australia, and probably have elsewhere unwittingly. I suspect judges haven't penalised because the coat can sometimes just feel like a winter, thicker coat. Myself, and several other breeders I know, have produced these and it's a great pity they aren't recognised, because they're stunning cats.

Smoke is also not recognised by some governing bodies - and these cats are also hampered. I've been unable to show my smoke girl because her mottled black nose leather, along with her very dark colouring, would simply not benefit her against her paler friends. SaucyWench (talk) 14:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added pictures to the wiki page of my cats. If you are wondering about getting Burmillas, you should. They are independent, playful, They are good with children and are very pretty. My two are grey with black markings. They are kind to each other and humans. It's really cute when they lick each others faces. Austinminers (talk) 02:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add some that are color and larger than 100x100 ? LegendLength (talk) 14:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of info needed.

May I suggest that this page undergoes serious review, asap? Blue eyed Burmillas in some bodies? Chocolate synonymous with sable/brown? (And so on....and on....) Much misinformation is contained here. Comyncats

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Burmilla/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Um... it doesn't matter wether you know it's a Burmilla or not. it matters wether other people who come to this web site for information know. If your cat looks like a Tiffany to other people, the picture should be changed to a better representation of a Burmilla, wehter it's you cat or not.

Last edited at 23:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Burmilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Burmilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.burmezen.com/db.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070424191201/http://www.breedlist.com/asian-breeders.html to http://www.breedlist.com/asian-breeders.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]