Talk:Brighton Rock (2010 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Brighton Mid‑importance

	East Sussex portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource about Brighton and Hove. If you would like to participate, please visit the project pageBrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

The film is not a remake

Rowan Joffe has said in interviews (see: [1]) that he was asked to remake the previous film and refused to do so, but after re-reading the novel he fell in love with it and decided to do a new adaptation of the novel. So the prior film is not a source for this new adaptation, thus it is not a remake. Many journalists have called it a "remake" either because they just assumed it was a remake or because they (wrongly) assume that the mere existence of a prior film, even if it is not a source for the new film, makes the term "remake" accurate. Some journalists, however, have got it right (see: [2]).142 and 99 (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, valid. See no problem with that. Thanks for clearing it up. Quentin X (talk) 15:52, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brighton Rock (2010 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111129224132/http://filmophilia.com/2011/07/29/brighton-rock-reveals-u-s-poster-trailer-and-release-date/ to http://filmophilia.com/2011/07/29/brighton-rock-reveals-u-s-poster-trailer-and-release-date/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]