Talk:Brianstorm

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Brianstorm is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Thunder image

An image of thunder? Is that possible? Surely it should be lightening - even though the lyric is "thunder". --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 19:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Release Date

The release date for this album is listed as April 16, 2007 at both Domino's website http://www.dominorecordco.com/uk/singles/07-06-07/brianstorm/ and in the MusicBrainz database. Where did the listed April 2nd date come from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.229.56.9 (talk) 04:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big Jim

While describing the sound of this song the second paragraph states:

features an "ascending guitar duel which sounds like a cross between Telstar, Mogwai and the Monkeys' own 'When the Sun Goes Down'."

A more accurate and concise description would be to compare it to "Big Jim" by "The Mackenzies" as the two tracks exhibit guitar riffs with almost "separated at birth" similarities. TheOverseer1984 (talk) 07:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not accept original research. Provide a reliable source and it may be added to the article. Also please do not link to copyright violating material. - kollision (talk) 08:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I can't find a source online stating as much, oh well. In reply to you: How do you know the video I linked to on this talk page was copyright infringing? As far as I'm aware, not everything on youtube is copyright violating, for all you know that video had all parties complete and utter approval. (very likely) TheOverseer1984 (talk) 01:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American release

Removed due to it being completely unncecessary. Why not have details on the release in other countries? The US isn't the only country in the world you know... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattkmarchant (talk • contribs) 16:56, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Brianstorm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brianstorm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071014024535/http://chcmedia.com:80/forums/index.php?showtopic=13882 to http://www.chcmedia.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=13882&pid=288137

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brianstorm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Number one in Canada"

The article stated that the single reached number one in Canada, which technically was the case according to Nielsen's singles chart. However, this is a big mislead as it is generally acknowledge that this chart was unreliable, as stated in the Wikipedia article about its charts:

"By 2004, sales in Canada declined even further, because of the growing popularity of digital downloading of music. As a result, Canadian sales are not as substantial as they had been before in the 1990s and early 2000s, and singles remained on the chart for even lengthier periods of time. In 2006, most Canadian number-one singles sold less than 200 copies."

Furthermore, it is stated that the song peaked at number 53 in Canada according to Billboard. With all this information, I decided to take out all references in the article of the song topping the charts in Canada as it otherwise leads people to think that the song was a massive hit there when really, it wasn't that big of a deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Florence and the Codeine (talk • contribs) 09:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]