Talk:Brant J. Pitre

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Bible

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

In a nutshell

In the divinity school he had a crisis of faith (which is rather the rule than the exception). After he recovered from such crisis, he decided that the dogmas of the Catholic Church are literally true, not only theologically, but also historically.

Just read https://www.penguin.co.nz/books/the-case-for-jesus-9780770435486 and you will see he strongly deviates from mainstream Bible scholarship. He is not a revolutionary of this academic field, he is a reactionary.

All of Pitre's books, however, are published by Image Books, essentially an "in house" Catholic press, by Catholics for Catholics, which wouldn't rate as a source for scholarly information, except in rare instances.
— qumrun60, Reddit

"So, in this video, Dr. Brant Pitre goes back and provides a context for what the Kingdom of God looks like in Daniel and how Daniel predicted the precise time of the coming of this Divine Messiah which is precisely the time the Jesus steps on to the scene." [1]. That is an often-repeated apologetic argument, but cuts no ice in the mainstream academia.

This source (which is not unfriendly to Pitre) calls one of his major works "apologetics". For those who are unacquainted with such terms, "apologetics" means it isn't WP:SCHOLARSHIP. The source actually loves his book, but in a odd way it is backstabbing him in respect to the mainstream academia. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]