Talk:Bow saw

Untitled

Have looked at this quite a bit and it seems bucksaws and bow saws (turning and crafting saws) have had a name collision. Bow saws are for craft work much as a coping saw where bucksaws are for, as example, cutting firewood (bucking) and rough work. Two very different usages homogenized together into the term bow saw. Likely this is because the modern bucksaw usually has a bowed pipe handle and people being how they are thought "that is a bow." Have not found any good references on the web delineating each type however, 45 years of cutting and ordering parts for both did until recently were almost every bucksaw is now called a bow saw ending the distinction and ending availability of proper bucksaw (tall) or bow saw (short) blades. Very difficult to acquire anything but the lowest common denominator in blades resulting in one size fits all. Suggest "coping saw" may be used for bow saw when bow saw is desired. For a bucksaw there is no replacement. August 27, 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.252.143.109 (talk) 21:14, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I undid the previous version because the terminology used doesn't exist in any published literature on English or American tools in any context I know about - expecially saws. Give me a relevant citation and I happy to be corrected Mathison2006 04:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-hmm, I have heard this type of saw being refered to as a Bowsaw.... I have added some incite into this matter on the Fretsaw page. I think that this 'cheap' type of tube bent saw was termed in common vernacular as such, because of it's overall similarity to a bow as used for violins and cellos. Maybe this could be cited as such. here is a picture of an actual bow-saw , [1] , this one though I can't see the traditional peg. Erlyrisa 04:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-you can't take the request for an expert seriously when the link to the most comprehensive article ever written in any medium on the engineering design of bow saws is removed as spam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.202.101.145 (talk)

-I have restored one of the two links removed; one link turned out to be a dead-link while the other does not look like link spam (the detailed article). I am not sure why this was considered linkspam. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have edited the links, they mentioned names and parts for sale etc, which made them look like link-spam Leevanjackson (talk) 19:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional Bow Saw

The picture of the traditional bow saw is too difficult to make out; the object of the image is silhouetted against and lost within a noisy background. Mfwitten (talk) 21:46, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frame saw?

How is this different from the frame saw? Make the distinction clear in the article or consider merge. Kortoso (talk) 20:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Frame saw Andy Dingley (talk) 21:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bow saw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628075812/http://bushcraft.org.nz/profiles/blogs/bowsaw-tutorial to http://bushcraft.org.nz/profiles/blogs/bowsaw-tutorial/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]