Talk:Boothi Vikramakesari
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boothi Vikramakesari article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User Sitush: Don't delete and don't hide
[edit]Do not delete sourced statements. If you have anything against quoting inscriptions feel free to add a tag disputing the neutrality or adding a statement to the effect that the inscriptions are not reliable. But deleting the inscriptions from the article is not the solution. Moreover your statement that inscriptions are Raj era work is your opinion. So suggest you dont thrust that on wikipedia. I am of the opinion that South India is very lucky to have monarchs who were brilliant enough to record their achievements in temples and such inscriptions have helped reconstruct south indian history to large extent. They might not be without flaws but throwing them away altogether is not wise. Nittavinoda (talk) 16:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Tamil Nadu articles
- Low-importance Tamil Nadu articles
- Stub-Class Tamil Nadu articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Tamil Nadu articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Stub-Class Hinduism articles
- Low-importance Hinduism articles