Talk:Books for the Blind

Books for the Blind is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request for Article Changes

Hello - I am writing this note as part of my official duties at the Library of Congress. The National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped (NLS) is part of the Library of Congress. This article describes "Books for the Blind" as if it's distinct from NLS when it is, in fact, a nickname for NLS. Further, NLS has a Wikipedia page, http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/National_Library_Service_for_the_Blind_and_Physically_Handicapped. Also, the numbers of books, magazines, and music titles in the "Books for the Blind" article are outdated. I'm looking for guidance on the most appropriate way to update this information. Would there be objections to someone from the Library of Congress updating the "Books for the Blind" article? Should readers of that article be encouraged to go to the NLS Wikipedia article? Thank you for any advice.

Mprlib (talk) 19:56, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten this article to represent that "Books for the Blind" is a subset of the NLS program; it's still referred to by name in some NLS documents, see this NLS report from about 2010. I do agree that this article is, however, significantly cumulative with the main NLS article and a more-skilled Wikipedia user may want to merge the two.

Irritatingpedant (talk) 19:54, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

The EBSCO links in the citations are no longer viable. You need to have a subscriptiption to read the articles linked to. Mabibliophile (talk) 17:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Books for the Blind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060225181518/http://www.michigan.gov:80/hal/0,1607,7-160-17445_19270_28958-79831--,00.html to http://www.michigan.gov/hal/0,1607,7-160-17445_19270_28958-79831--,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]