Talk:Blue Origin Federation, LLC v. United States

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 28 (reset on 30) May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Blue Origin v. United States & SpaceX. The result of the discussion was moved to Blue Origin Federation, LLC v. United States.

On 29 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Blue Origin v. United States & SpaceX. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn.

Disagree with the move

This move

I would simply shorten Space Exploration etc to SpaceX. That's the only modification needed according toWikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Legal#Cases. If the trial was particularly notable, then the notable name of the trial could be used (but it wouldn't be displayed in italics anyway).

CodemWiki (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the title but I made a mistake, I intended to move it to Blue Origin v. United States & SpaceX but I, instead, inadvertently moved it to Blue Origin v. SpaceX.

I will correct my mistake in a few days (when wikipedia will let me, Wikipedia doesn't allow more than one move per day? I assume). CodemWiki (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 (reset on 30) May 2023

Requested move 30 May 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Blue Origin Federation, LLC v. United States. WP:BARTENDER. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 23:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Origin v. SpaceX → Blue Origin v. United States & SpaceX – ultimately shortened from Blue Origin v. United States & Space Exploration Technologies Corp. which was deemed too long of a title. I accidentally reset because I thought it should be written "v." but apparently according to Wikipedi standards it's v. in the US and v in other countries, so it was fine then and didn't need to be reset CodemWiki (talk) 17:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 00:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Sennecaster (Chat) 05:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Origin v. SpaceX → Blue Origin v United States & SpaceX – Blue Origin v. United States & Space Exploration Technologies Corp. should be shortened but was accidentally shortened too much CodemWiki (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it in the first place because it was too long indeed. Don't you think the title should say that it's about the HLS conflict, though? Cocobb8 (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Legal#Cases, if the trial was particularly notable, then the notable name of the trial could be used. CodemWiki (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that makes sense, then. One thing, though, is that articles about legal cases seem to use "v" instead of "v." Cocobb8 (talk) 15:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to Case citation it's v. in the Us and v in other circumstances? I honestly had no idea. CodemWiki (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the official case name is BLUE ORIGIN FEDERATION, LLC v. United States. See here. Yahoo also uses a version of that name. Capitalization would have to be adjusted, but Blue Origin Federation, LLC v. United States might work? The proposed title might also work; United States should be in there somewhere, though. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 14:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ok with this! I'll move it to this. Cocobb8 (💬 talk to me! • ✏️ my contributions) 15:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cocobb8: Please don't move articles before an RM is closed. It's not good etiquette. Sennecaster (Chat) 16:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was my mistake. I forgot about closing the RM. Should I revert? Cocobb8 (💬 talk to me! • ✏️ my contributions) 17:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 29 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. I believe the reply indicates that CodemWiki is no longer requesting this page move. If that is not correct, CodemWiki may undo this closure. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 13:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Origin Federation, LLC v. United States → Blue Origin v. United States & SpaceX – Considering that the full case name is Blue Origin LLC v. United States of America & Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, Blue Origin v. United States & SpaceX simplifies it faithfully in a way that unambiguously identifies the different actors. The current title goes into too much detail by using the full name of Blue Origin while getting rid of SpaceX in the title, it's unbalanced. CodemWiki (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose adding SpaceX. In the United States it is customary to list only the first plaintiff and first defendant when referring to a case, so this would not be the WP:COMMONNAME. I would be fine with Blue Origin v. United States or the current title. SilverLocust 💬 21:21, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know that. I would be fine with the current title then. CodemWiki (talk) 07:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.