Talk:Black Norwegian Elkhound
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Black Norwegian Elkhound article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Additional Photos?
[edit]Might someone be able to produce an additional photo of this dog? I'd like to see the tail "tightly curled over the back, but not carried on either side" per FCI standards. Graphic examples of what constitutes 'a little white on the feet' would be nice too as would a profile image of the head. Keesiewonder 13:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- It would be nice to see an adult photo of the breed. Preferably standing up. cReep (talk) 07:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- someone nicely added an adult picture. I have made that the infobox photo and moved the puppy picture down into the appearance section. I feel a better picture is still needed but I could not find a free one easily.Jemmaca (talk) 10:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
English name
[edit]It was stated that "elkhound" is a mistranslation and that it, despite its name, is not a hound. The Wikipedia article on hound states that "A hound is a type of dog that assists hunters by tracking or chasing the animal being hunted." This is exactly what an elkhound does. I took the liberty of changing this, my apologies if I am mistaken about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pegster (talk • contribs) 00:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
It is commonly accepted as not belonging to hounds, despite the somewhat confusing definition of hounds, as you point out. It's not so much as a mistranslation, as a direct one. The norwegian word "hund" means dog, while norwegian doesn't have a seperate word for "hound". So having the name of the breed called "hund" in norwegian suggests it is a hound, which it isn't.
Simply viewing the article you quoted, which has a list of hounds, would indicate that this is so, since none of the Elkhounds are listed there.
83.108.234.140 (talk) 19:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Distinct from Grey Norwegian Elkhound
[edit]I removed the links breed standards for all kennel clubs other than FCI in the infobox. When I read them they were talking about the Grey version of the dog. some specified that black was not allowed and others just that it must be grey and not too dark.
I also removed the note that mentions it as being 2 breeds. As this article is only about the Black version that was not appropriate for the infobox. Jemmaca (talk) 10:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Black Norwegian Elkhound. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070213041522/http://www.necgb.org.uk:80/ to http://www.necgb.org.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 3 November 2016 (UTC)