Talk:Birtha (Mesopotamia)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Birtha (Mesopotamia) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone please elucidate these references?
[edit]They're all just abbreviations and as a reader who is not an expert on the subject matter I have absolutely no idea what they are intended to indicate or how to follow up on them. Folly Mox (talk) 21:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK so every cite (and, indeed, the full text of the article) is verbatim the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography (Template:DGRG!) entry. I've checked out the front and back matter of that work and, as far as I've been able to determine, the expansions of the abbreviated citations in that work (and they are all abbreviated) are neither defined in any standalone section nor when they first appear in the text, as if the Dictionary had been written exclusively for subject matter experts from the mid-1800s. Does anyone in MilHist have any experience with this? Folly Mox (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- Start-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- Start-Class Classical warfare articles
- Classical warfare task force articles
- Start-Class Iraq articles
- Unknown-importance Iraq articles
- WikiProject Iraq articles
- Start-Class Assyrian articles
- Low-importance Assyrian articles
- WikiProject Assyria articles
- Start-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages