Talk:Bird Cage Theatre

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bird Cage Theatre article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Old West / Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bird Cage Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012232114/http://www.ghost-trackers.org:80/birdcage.htm to http://www.ghost-trackers.org/birdcage.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Legends of the Bird Cage

It looks like there's a slow-moving edit war cyclically adding and removing the blurb about the longest poker game, dating back to October 2018 when User:72.201.108.190 removed a number of stories about the Bird Cage based on information to the contrary. Reading the edit history, there seems to be a great amount of information there that could be used to enrich the page rather than just to justify taking it apart.

I wonder - would it be possible to strike a compromise, and have that and some of the deleted material included in order to cover the various 'myths' about the place? Both explaining the assertions that have become part of the building's mythology over the years, and presenting the counter information to explain why they're unlikely? Rather than relegating it all to deletions and comments on deletions? -- K.Yadin (talk) 07:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]